• Hello there guest and welcome to our forum!
    To gain full access you must Register. Registration is free and it takes only a few moments to complete.
    Already a member? Login here then!

Chevy Camaro and Dodge Challenger better than Ford's Mustang? Consumer Reports says

wickedstangs

Chula Vista, CA
Staff member
Administrator
<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/review-2010-ford-mustang-gt/#11"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/cpmustang_lead.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="center"> <em><strong><small>2010 Ford Mustang GT - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em><br /></div>
<br /> Sorry <em>Transformers</em> fans, but your precious <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/Bumblebee/">Bumblebee</a> just got his butt whooped. Color us not surprised. Because for anyone that's ever driven the Detroit Three's <em>nouveau </em>muscle cars (and seriously evaluated them), the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/2010MustangGT/">2010 Mustang GT</a> is clearly Best of Show material. It's just too refined, too capable and let's be honest, too good. Especially when compared to the cetacean Dodge Challenger R/T. How obvious? Even <em>Consumer Reports</em> says so. <br /> <br /> True, it used to be getting your sports car endorsed by <em>Consumer Reports</em> was kinda like Tipper Gore and Joe Lieberman banging their heads and flashing approving devil signs at your band. But somewhere about ten years back, the ad-free, subscriber-funded mag began testing cars that enthusiasts might actually want to buy. And then they began factoring in metrics like acceleration, handling and braking, while still lowering eyelids with stats on mileage and reliability (we kid, we kid).<br /> <br /> So yeah - straight up, the 315 horsepower Ford Mustang GT got a rating of "Very Good" and 78 points, whereas the 426 hp Chevrolet Camaro SS got "Very Good" but only 71 points, whereas the 370 hp Challenger R/T received a rating of merely "Good" and just 53 points. <br /><br />But wait, there's more! <em>CR</em> also tested the Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8, Subaru WRX and Nissan 370Z. How did the evolved-but-not-revolved 'Stang stack up? Funny you should ask.<em> Consumer Reports</em>' press release doesn't say. Specifically, it doesn't give numeric scores for the sporty Asian cars. However, all three non-domestics got the (apparently) coveted "Very Good" rating, meaning they all finished ahead of the Challenger. And yes, the big Dodge had the six-speed manual. Part of the Challenger's problem is no doubt this sentence: "Braking is mediocre and it has a big car feel rather than a sports car." But the real question is, which car won the competition outright? All we know is that the new issue comes out today. PR posted after the jump.<br /> <br /> <br /> <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-ford-mustang-gt/low/">Review: 2010 Ford Mustang GT</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-ford-mustang-gt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/2010mustanggtabg_01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-ford-mustang-gt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/2010mustanggtabg_02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-ford-mustang-gt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/2010mustanggtabg_03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-ford-mustang-gt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/2010mustanggtabg_04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/review-2010-ford-mustang-gt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/2010mustanggtabg_05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /> [Source: <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/index.htm">Consumer Reports</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/01/chevy-camaro-and-dodge-challenger-better-than-fords-mustang-i/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chevy Camaro and Dodge Challenger better than Ford's Mustang? <i> Consumer Reports</i> says 'neigh'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/01/chevy-camaro-and-dodge-challenger-better-than-fords-mustang-i/">Chevy Camaro and Dodge Challenger better than Ford's Mustang? <i> Consumer Reports</i> says 'neigh'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:57:00 EST. Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/01/chevy-camaro-and-dodge-challenger-better-than-fords-mustang-i/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19146699/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/01/chevy-camaro-and-dodge-challenger-better-than-fords-mustang-i/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>


More...
 

Panic661

Well-Known Member
Think the 2010 mustang gt performs a little better dragstrip wise as well o_O I may be wrong..

I just see the challenger/slowmaro as well, bulky and ugly...not a fan of them..

I like the 10s minus the plastic crap I keep seeing on it..

As far as the Hyundai 370 and WRX are concerned..well... Hyundai is NOT going to compete with the sports cars..not number wise and be able to be efficient without breaking..

WRX, whatever.. cool ya, still a 4 door family sadan with a turbo on it, hey I guess I'll turbo a minivan to make it haul ass next..

370Z ... so it carries how much more power then the 350 but still looks like the 350 but costs how much more??
 
Top