Shane361
Well-Known Member
Well I'm still not sold on this being the best mustang ever. Going from an 04 Cobra to an 09 GT 500, so far has left me bewildered. IMHO the cobra looks better, more menacing. It doesn't have rear mudflaps??????, nor a 4x4 stance at the rear. For such a large car why is the interior more cramped than an 04? The front seats are only inches from the rear. Why is the parking brake on the wrong side? It cramps leg room for the driver. The cupholders are completely in the way of the shifter if you have a drink. The door pockets are ****in joke. The center console lid is to low and to far back to be of any use. It's a pita. Why can't you flip a simple lever to adjust the steering wheel, instead of adjusting the entire column? Cheap ass exterior mirrors, not body colored or folding. Cheap ass visors, not lighted. All this is unaccetable in a 46-50K car. The only pros I see is the shifter is light years better and so are the brakes. Engine.......well that is what has brought us to this posting. As I was going to overlook all the other SHORTCOMINGS until now.......
Went to the track Saturday night. It was warmish but extremely humid. However this is not an excuse for a supposedly 500 hp car. Keep in mind my stock 04 in good air went 12.62 @ 111, so I was expecting a car with 100+ more hp to rival that time in crappy weather. Oh was I wrong. This beast went a blistering 13.051 @ 107.72, as its best time. Yep 13.05 @ 107.72 best run. That was with a 2.027 60ft, powershifting at 6300rpms. It also ran 13.468 @ 106.33(2.182 60ft), 13.410 @ 105.97 (2.182 60ft), 13.449 @ 105.72 (2.133 60ft), 13.185 @ 106.99 (2.019 60ft), 13.291 @ 106.71 (2.169 60ft), and lastly a 13.160 @ 106.91 (2.034 60ft). Could I possilby have gotten a 12.9....sure with a hair better 60ft, but where is the top end charge????????? Am I the only one with a car that doesn't live up to the 115 mph trap speed hype? WTF. Thank God there wasn't a 2010 SS out there, I would've gone home with my tail between my legs. If I could UNLOAD this car tommorrow for payoff it would be gone. Atleast the wife said, "save up and buy another Terminator".
Curious what you GT500 guys are running at the track? Those of you who had a Terminator experience same issues? -Shane
Went to the track Saturday night. It was warmish but extremely humid. However this is not an excuse for a supposedly 500 hp car. Keep in mind my stock 04 in good air went 12.62 @ 111, so I was expecting a car with 100+ more hp to rival that time in crappy weather. Oh was I wrong. This beast went a blistering 13.051 @ 107.72, as its best time. Yep 13.05 @ 107.72 best run. That was with a 2.027 60ft, powershifting at 6300rpms. It also ran 13.468 @ 106.33(2.182 60ft), 13.410 @ 105.97 (2.182 60ft), 13.449 @ 105.72 (2.133 60ft), 13.185 @ 106.99 (2.019 60ft), 13.291 @ 106.71 (2.169 60ft), and lastly a 13.160 @ 106.91 (2.034 60ft). Could I possilby have gotten a 12.9....sure with a hair better 60ft, but where is the top end charge????????? Am I the only one with a car that doesn't live up to the 115 mph trap speed hype? WTF. Thank God there wasn't a 2010 SS out there, I would've gone home with my tail between my legs. If I could UNLOAD this car tommorrow for payoff it would be gone. Atleast the wife said, "save up and buy another Terminator".
Curious what you GT500 guys are running at the track? Those of you who had a Terminator experience same issues? -Shane