beejay31000
BULLWINKLE
what, your not happy with a stock 460 hp??
-
Hello there guest and welcome to our forum!
To gain full access you must Register. Registration is free and it takes only a few moments to complete.
Already a member? Login here then!
Dyno Shootout print outs.....
- Thread starter Gibs
- Start date
i was stoked but i wanted to know for sure. i was lying to myself. i had to know after everyone was talking about their numbers and the contraversy. still comes out to about 469 at the fly.
beejay31000
BULLWINKLE
i should have dyno'd mine so i had a good number!
FordFanStan
New Member
DSG were you the one that stopped by on Monday? I was out of the office yesterday so I don't know if Dante and you spoke again. After you stopped by I looked on here and found there were many more people other than just you that had weird readings. So your A/F could be off, but whether it reads low or high, it still leans out at 6400rpm iirc, so keep it under 6100 just to be safe for now bud. FFS
the highest i take it is to 6000, dont make any more power after that anyway. FFS i do want to get tuned but i am having issues getting my SCT livewire back. yep thats me good ole DSG. the laughing stock of the mustang community.
wikedcobra312
Well-Known Member
i like your new numbers, for the simple mods you have, your car is a beast
thanks wiked. im thinkin suspension and tires. anyone monkey can go fast in a straight line but when you kick the ass end out in 4th and drift through a corner....that is more my style.
Look at the correction value........from what I was told. a 1.17 is way high.......
Should have been lower. That would inflate your numbers.
Here is what I am talking about.
If I am wrong I am sorry, just going with what I was told.....
Gib
Should have been lower. That would inflate your numbers.
Here is what I am talking about.
If I am wrong I am sorry, just going with what I was told.....
Gib
the A1.010 is the atmospheric pressure and the X is the corrected value so yes gib i concur. way too high.
FordFanStan
New Member
Gib you're right. Although I cannot recall on a dyno dynamics whether they can manually enter the correction factor or not? Some dynos you can and some use weather stations that automatically figure the correction factor for you, (but most of the time can be over-ridden anyhow). Way back in November 2007 when we used their dyno, it had that same 1.17 correction factor, so theoretically if you use that correction factor and it is valid, which it should be, the DMP truck laid down 826/798.
Divide your numbers by whatever correction factor is on your print out, and that should give you pretty accurate corrected results.
For instance, DSGs numbers are more realistic and seem appropriate at 393/379 for his mods. FFS
Divide your numbers by whatever correction factor is on your print out, and that should give you pretty accurate corrected results.
For instance, DSGs numbers are more realistic and seem appropriate at 393/379 for his mods. FFS
So in this case, I would take 348/335 and divide by 1.17?
Doesnt the computer already do that once?
Gib
Doesnt the computer already do that once?
Gib
297/286
Seems low by that theory for a 395 HP setup.........
Gib
Seems low by that theory for a 395 HP setup.........
Gib
GT400SC
PM for Decals
That can't be right.
That formula says that we all have in actuality, only 85% of what they recorded.
That's not possible. Nobody is THAT far off!
That formula says that we all have in actuality, only 85% of what they recorded.
That's not possible. Nobody is THAT far off!
FordFanStan said:
i liked the other numbers better. man it just keeps getting worse and worse.:bs:
GT400SC
PM for Decals
But I keep coming back to the same dilemma....My car dynoed right where it should have!
What's up with that?
Last time I dynoed was 325HP. I added an X-pipe, Borla Stingers and lighter wheels (rotating mass). I expected about a 10-15 HP gain from all three.
And I dynoed at 340, right on the money!
What's up with that?
Last time I dynoed was 325HP. I added an X-pipe, Borla Stingers and lighter wheels (rotating mass). I expected about a 10-15 HP gain from all three.
And I dynoed at 340, right on the money!
well they didnt strap the car down and i am not sure if that had anything to do with it or not.
GT400SC
PM for Decals
I'm convinced it was this scenario....
"Get the money, get them in, get them out, tell them what they want to hear...NEXT!!!!!"
"Get the money, get them in, get them out, tell them what they want to hear...NEXT!!!!!"
and i am not too far off from concurring with your hypothesis.
The not being strapped down would cause you tpbe lower than expected and their Dyno.....aka "Dream Maker" is reading high......
My ratio was 55:1 and the correction factor was 1.17.........I have a stock TBSS with 4.10 gears. How the heck can you tell if that is the right ratio? I work with reduction gear and crap. I know how it works, and what the ratio means but how would I know if that was correct or not?
Gib
My ratio was 55:1 and the correction factor was 1.17.........I have a stock TBSS with 4.10 gears. How the heck can you tell if that is the right ratio? I work with reduction gear and crap. I know how it works, and what the ratio means but how would I know if that was correct or not?
Gib
wikedcobra312
Well-Known Member
we may never know, its a dream